United States v. Katherine Segal
This text of United States v. Katherine Segal (United States v. Katherine Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30031
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00054-BLW
v. MEMORANDUM* KATHERINE ANNE SEGAL, a.k.a. Kat Gibson, a.k.a. Katherine Anne Gibson, a.k.a. Katherine Anne Preston,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 27, 2018*
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Katherine Anne Segal appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 70-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for
possession with intent to distribute and importation of Alpha-PVP, in violation of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 21 U.S.C §§ 841(a)(1) and 952. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.
Segal contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the
district court gave excessive weight to deterrence and public safety concerns and
failed to consider sufficiently her personal characteristics, including her history of
substance abuse, untreated mental health issues, and an eating disorder. The
district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38,
51 (2007). “The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for
the discretion of the district court.” United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d
904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009). The low-end, 70-month sentence is substantively
reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of
the circumstances, including Segal’s criminal history, the failure of prior sentences
to deter her from further criminal conduct, and the large quantity of Alpha-PVP
she imported. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.
AFFIRMED.
2 18-30031
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Katherine Segal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-katherine-segal-ca9-2018.