United States v. Kashiwabara

10 M.J. 602
U S Air Force Court of Military Review·Decided November 24, 1980·No. ACM 22854·Published

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

In a single assignment of error, appellant argues that the court-martial convened to try his case lacked subject matter jurisdiction over one of the offenses charged.

That offense involved violation of a lawful general regulation by selling a dangerous drug-in this case, psilocybin-contrary to Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892.

Basically, solicitation and negotiations concerning sale of the drug between two enlisted personnel occurred on base; transfer and payment occurred off base.

We find that on the facts of this case, subject matter jurisdiction clearly existed. United States v. Trottier, 9 M.J. 337 (C.M.A.1980); United States v. Hardin, 7 M.J. 399 (C.M.A.1979); United States v. Carr, 7 M.J. 339 (C.M.A.1979); United States v. Strangstalien, 7 M.J. 225 (C.M.A.1979).

Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kashiwabara, 10 M.J. 602 (usafctmilrev 1980).

10 M.J. 602 (United States v. Kashiwabara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Strangstalien
7 M.J. 225 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Carr
7 M.J. 339 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Hardin
7 M.J. 399 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Trottier
9 M.J. 337 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)