United States v. Kashiwabara

10 M.J. 602
CourtU S Air Force Court of Military Review
DecidedNovember 24, 1980
DocketACM 22854
StatusPublished

This text of 10 M.J. 602 (United States v. Kashiwabara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U S Air Force Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kashiwabara, 10 M.J. 602 (usafctmilrev 1980).

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

In a single assignment of error, appellant argues that the court-martial convened to try his case lacked subject matter jurisdiction over one of the offenses charged.

That offense involved violation of a lawful general regulation by selling a dangerous drug-in this case, psilocybin-contrary to Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892.

Basically, solicitation and negotiations concerning sale of the drug between two enlisted personnel occurred on base; transfer and payment occurred off base.

We find that on the facts of this case, subject matter jurisdiction clearly existed. United States v. Trottier, 9 M.J. 337 (C.M.A.1980); United States v. Hardin, 7 M.J. 399 (C.M.A.1979); United States v. Carr, 7 M.J. 339 (C.M.A.1979); United States v. Strangstalien, 7 M.J. 225 (C.M.A.1979).

Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Strangstalien
7 M.J. 225 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Carr
7 M.J. 339 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Hardin
7 M.J. 399 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Trottier
9 M.J. 337 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 M.J. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kashiwabara-usafctmilrev-1980.