United States v. Karo

465 U.S. 1064, 104 S. Ct. 1411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Karo. Read the opinion of the Court — 468 U.S. 705
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 27, 1984·No. No. 83-850·Published

Opinion

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 464 U. S. 1068.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that respondent Gene R. Rhodes is allowed to proceed in forma pauperis and that Roger Barges, Esquire, of Albuquerque, N. M., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Gene R. Rhodes in this case.

Justice Blackmun dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Karo, 465 U.S. 1064, 104 S. Ct. 1411 (1984).

465 U.S. 1064 (United States v. Karo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.