United States v. Kareem A. Nagib

106 F.3d 404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Kareem A. Nagib. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 F.3d 798
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 21, 1997·No. 96-3471·Unpublished

Opinion

106 F.3d 404

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kareem A. NAGIB, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-3471.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 6, 1997.*
Decided Jan. 17, 1997.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 21, 1997.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and WELLFORD** and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated by that court.

AFFIRMED.

*

This successive appeal has been assigned to the original panel under Internal Operating Procedure 6(b). The panel heard oral argument on the initial appeal and is unanimously of the view that a second argument is unnecessary

**

Hon. Harry W. Wellford, Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, is sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kareem A. Nagib, 106 F.3d 404 (7th Cir. 1997).

106 F.3d 404 (United States v. Kareem A. Nagib) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.