United States v. Kaplan

133 F.3d 826, 1998 WL 20874
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 22, 1998·No. 95-4908·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 95-4908.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Barry KAPLAN, Defendant-Appellant.

July 31, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 94-422-CR- SH), Shelby Highsmith, Judge.

On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.

(Opinion January 22, 1998, 11th Cir., 133 F.3d 826).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of

rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor

of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous

panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kaplan, 133 F.3d 826, 1998 WL 20874 (11th Cir. 1998).

133 F.3d 826 (United States v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Nghia Le
256 F.3d 1229 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Barry Kaplan
171 F.3d 1351 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Sandoval v. Hagan
7 F. Supp. 2d 1234 (M.D. Alabama, 1998)
United States v. Kaplan
133 F.3d 826 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)