United States v. Kaplan
This text of 133 F.3d 826 (United States v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 95-4908 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 07/31/98 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BARRY KAPLAN, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida --------------------------
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion January 22, 1998, 11th Cir., 133 F.3rd 826)
(July 31, 1998)
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing
en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing
en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this
court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED. FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 07/31/98 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 F.3d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kaplan-ca11-1998.