United States v. Kamaury Watson
This text of United States v. Kamaury Watson (United States v. Kamaury Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 19-1837 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Kamaury Taujheim Watson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________
Submitted: March 9, 2020 Filed: May 8, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Kamaury Taujheim Watson pled guilty to possessing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and (9), subject to penalties outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). The district court1 sentenced him to 45 months of imprisonment, followed by 3 years of supervised release. Watson challenges his sentence. According to Watson, the district court misapplied § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”), resulting in an improper sentencing enhancement.
We disagree. Section 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) of the Guidelines increases a defendant’s offense level by four points if he “used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). And Watson possessed a gun “in connection with” a contemporaneous violation of Iowa Code section 724.4(1). Under United States v. Walker, violating Iowa Code section 724.4(1) counts as “another felony offense” for purposes of § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). 771 F.3d 449, 452–53 (8th Cir. 2014).
Watson contends Walker was wrongly decided. However, Walker is binding precedent and one panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel. Mader v. United States, 654 F.3d 794, 800 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc). We therefore affirm his sentence. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Kamaury Watson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kamaury-watson-ca8-2020.