United States v. Jwc, Juvenile Male
This text of 603 F. App'x 644 (United States v. Jwc, Juvenile Male) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
In this appeal, J.W.C. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his adjudication as a juvenile delinquent under the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5037, for committing sexual abuse on an Indian reservation in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 2242(2)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.
J.W.C. argues there was insufficient evidence that he engaged in a sexual act with the victim. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2242(2) (“sexual abuse” requires a “sexual act”) & 2246(2)(A) (defining “sexual act”). The victim testified, however, that she awoke to find J.W.C.’s penis and finger in her vagina, and JW.C.’s DNA was discovered on the victim’s underwear. There thus plainly was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. See 18 U.S.C. § 2246(2)(A) (“[T]he term ‘sexual act’ means contact between the penis and the vulva....”); United States v. Gudino, 432 F.2d 433, 434 (9th Cir.1970) (per curiam) (“The testimony of the one witness, if believed, was sufficient to support the conviction.... ”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
603 F. App'x 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jwc-juvenile-male-ca9-2015.