United States v. Juvenile Male

420 F. App'x 778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Juvenile Male. Read the opinion of the Court — 590 F.3d 924
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2011·No. 08-30354·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

R.C., a juvenile male, appeals from an order in which the district court adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and sentenced him to five years detention based on violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2)(B) (sexual abuse) and 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a) (offense committed within Indian country). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), R.C.’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental *779 brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Juvenile Male, 420 F. App'x 778 (9th Cir. 2011).

420 F. App'x 778 (United States v. Juvenile Male) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)