United States v. Juvenile Female

363 F. App'x 503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Juvenile Female. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 F.3d 943
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2010·No. 09-10078·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Juvenile Female appeals from the sentence imposed following the revocation of juvenile delinquent supervision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Juvenile Female contends that the district court erred by imposing a sentence contrary to the rehabilitative goals of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act. (“FJDA”). The record reflects that the district court adequately considered the relevant factors within the FJDA while accounting for the particularized rehabilitative needs of Juvenile Female, and im *504 posed a sentence that was the least restrictive means to meet those needs. Cf United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 787-90 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Juvenile Female, 363 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2010).

363 F. App'x 503 (United States v. Juvenile Female) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Juvenile
347 F.3d 778 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)