United States v. Justin Call

Tenth Circuit

United States v. Justin Call

45 F.3d 440, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5729, 1995 WL 7451

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 9, 1995

Docket94-2164

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 440 (United States v. Justin Call) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Justin Call, 45 F.3d 440, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5729, 1995 WL 7451 (10th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 440
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Justin CALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-2164.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1995.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER & JUDGMENT1

Petitioner Justin Call appeals from a district court order denying him bail pending appeal of his conviction for possession with the intent to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine. He contends on appeal that he is eligible for bail pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1355(c). We review the district court's ruling under a deferential standard, deciding whether petitioner has met the applicable standards set out in 18 U.S.C. 1343, and whether he has demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting his release. Id. 1343(c). Upon consideration thereof, and after careful consideration of the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district court's order should be, and therefore is, AFFIRMED.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 440
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Justin CALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-2164.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1995.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER & JUDGMENT1

Petitioner Justin Call appeals from a district court order denying him bail pending appeal of his conviction for possession with the intent to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine. He contends on appeal that he is eligible for bail pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1355(c). We review the district court's ruling under a deferential standard, deciding whether petitioner has met the applicable standards set out in 18 U.S.C. 1343, and whether he has demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting his release. Id. 1343(c). Upon consideration thereof, and after careful consideration of the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district court's order should be, and therefore is, AFFIRMED.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 440, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5729, 1995 WL 7451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-justin-call-ca10-1995.