United States v. Justin

511 F. App'x 247
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2013
DocketNo. 12-8043
StatusPublished

This text of 511 F. App'x 247 (United States v. Justin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Justin, 511 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rodney K. Justin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his request for certain records pertaining to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Justin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 F. App'x 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-justin-ca4-2013.