United States v. Jurado-Enriquez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-50931 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JORGE JURADO-ENRIQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-389-ALL --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Jurado-Enriquez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Jurado-Enriquez has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there is
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jurado-Enriquez (United States v. Jurado-Enriquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.