United States v. Julio Feliciano, Jr.

463 F. App'x 611
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 2011
Docket10-10186
StatusUnpublished

This text of 463 F. App'x 611 (United States v. Julio Feliciano, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Julio Feliciano, Jr., 463 F. App'x 611 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Julio Cesar Feliciano, Jr. appeals from his jury-trial convictions for armed bank robbery and use of a firearm. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Feliciano contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he admitted Feliciano’s guilt to a count that exposed him to a possible life sentence. We decline to review this claim on direct appeal because the record is insufficiently developed and the legal representation was not so inadequate that it obviously denied Feliciano his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. See United States v. Daychild, 357 F.3d 1082, 1095 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment without prejudice to Feliciano raising this issue in a collateral attack on the conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 F. App'x 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-julio-feliciano-jr-ca9-2011.