United States v. Julian David Brooks

325 F.2d 1019
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1964
Docket9009_1
StatusPublished

This text of 325 F.2d 1019 (United States v. Julian David Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Julian David Brooks, 325 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

325 F.2d 1019

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Julian David BROOKS, Appellant.

No. 9009.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued January 7, 1964.

Decided January 9, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Edwin M. Stanley, Judge.

Michael G. Plumides, Charlotte, N. C. (Plumides & Plumides, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty. (Roy G. Hall, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUTCHESON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed on the opinion of the District Court. United States v. Brooks, 221 F. Supp. 852.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brooks
221 F. Supp. 852 (M.D. North Carolina, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F.2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-julian-david-brooks-ca4-1964.