United States v. Jue Wy

D. Vermont

United States v. Jue Wy

103 F. 795, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174

DecidedApril 19, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 103 F. 795 (United States v. Jue Wy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jue Wy, 103 F. 795, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174 (D. Vt. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

The testimony as to the birth of the appellant in this country is direct, positive, and circumstantial, and is not unnatural or improbable. It is not contradicted or discredited, and cannot justly be disregarded. Although the burden of proof as to this birth is upon the appellant, coming now from China, this evidence seems to overcome the presumption arising from having been lately in that country, and to establish the fact of nativity in this country. Appellant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

The testimony as to the birth of the appellant in this country is direct, positive, and circumstantial, and is not unnatural or improbable. It is not contradicted or discredited, and cannot justly be disregarded. Although the burden of proof as to this birth is upon the appellant, coming now from China, this evidence seems to overcome the presumption arising from having been lately in that country, and to establish the fact of nativity in this country. Appellant discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 F. 795, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jue-wy-vtd-1900.