United States v. Judith Williams

623 F. App'x 193
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 13, 2015
Docket15-40426
StatusUnpublished

This text of 623 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Judith Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Judith Williams, 623 F. App'x 193 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Judith Lee Williams appeals her guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to produce child pornography and production of child pornography. Williams argues that her guilty plea and the waiver of her appellate rights were not knowing and voluntary. The Government moves to summarily dismiss the appeal as barred by the appeal waiver or, in the alternative, moves for an extension of time to file a brief.

We reject the Government’s request for summary dismissal because the issue requires individualized consideration of the facts of Williams’s case. United States v. Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev., 445 F.3d 771, 781 (5th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Taylor, 631 F.2d 419, 420 n. 1 (5th Cir.1980). Williams’s claim survives the waiver because this court will not enforce an appeal waiver unless the guilty plea was informed and voluntary. See United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261, 269 (5th Cir.1997). Nevertheless, the signed plea agreement and rearraignment transcript show that Williams freely and knowingly pleaded guilty and waived her appellate rights. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir.1994); United States v. Guerra, 94 F.3d 989, 995 (5th Cir.1996). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary dismissal is DENIED. The alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED as unnecessary.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dees
125 F.3d 261 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Robert Cameron Taylor
631 F.2d 419 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Nicholas Arthur Portillo
18 F.3d 290 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Robert Rolando Guerra
94 F.3d 989 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-judith-williams-ca5-2015.