United States v. Juan Pompa Zarate
This text of 458 F.2d 514 (United States v. Juan Pompa Zarate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
458 F.2d 514
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juan Pompa ZARATE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2466.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 8, 1972.
Rehearing Denied June 30, 1972.
Morris Lavine (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Shelby R. Gott, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and CURTIS, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this marijuana amphetamine tablets smuggling case is affirmed.
We have considered the more than one dozen points asserted. Although ably presented, we cannot agree with any of them.
The Honorable Jesse W. Curtis, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 F.2d 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-juan-pompa-zarate-ca9-1972.