United States v. Juan Pablo Martinez, A/K/A Juan Paul Martinez, A/K/A Paul Martinez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Juan Pablo Martinez, A/K/A Juan Paul Martinez, A/K/A Paul Martinez

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24913, 1995 WL 419965

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 13, 1995·No. 95-6461·Published

Opinion

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juan Pablo MARTINEZ, a/k/a Juan Paul Martinez, a/k/a Paul
Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6461.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 13, 1995.

Juan Pablo Martinez, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA; Robert Bullington Wilson, V, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Hampton, VA, for Appellee.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martinez, Nos. CR-89-21-NN; CA-95-2-4 (E.D.Va. Feb. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juan Pablo MARTINEZ, a/k/a Juan Paul Martinez, a/k/a Paul
Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6461.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 13, 1995.

Juan Pablo Martinez, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA; Robert Bullington Wilson, V, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Hampton, VA, for Appellee.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martinez, Nos. CR-89-21-NN; CA-95-2-4 (E.D.Va. Feb. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Juan Pablo Martinez, A/K/A Juan Paul Martinez, A/K/A Paul Martinez, 60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24913, 1995 WL 419965 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

60 F.3d 826 (United States v. Juan Pablo Martinez, A/K/A Juan Paul Martinez, A/K/A Paul Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.