United States v. Juan Ledezma

581 F. App'x 452
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 2014
Docket13-41210
StatusUnpublished

This text of 581 F. App'x 452 (United States v. Juan Ledezma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Juan Ledezma, 581 F. App'x 452 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Ledezma was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, cocaine, and marihuana. His sole issue on appeal is that he was deprived of a fair trial because his counsel was ineffective.

As Ledezma acknowledges, the general rule is that ineffective-assistance claims cannot be resolved on direct appeal unless the issue has first been raised before the district court. See United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359, 363 (5th Cir.1998). Ineffective assistance was not raised in the district court, and the record is not sufficiently developed for us to deviate from the general rule. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jack Hutchins Haese
162 F.3d 359 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 F. App'x 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-juan-ledezma-ca5-2014.