United States v. Juan Gomez
This text of 450 F. App'x 680 (United States v. Juan Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Juan Carlos Chavez Gomez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gomez contends that the district court erred by determining that his prior conviction for assault with a firearm, in violation of California Penal Code § 245(a)(2), constituted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, because section 245(a)(2) does not contain the requisite intent or use of force. Gomez concedes, however, that this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1191-97 (9th Cir. 2009); see also United States v. Heron-Salinas, 566 F.3d 898, 899 (9th Cir.2009).
As Gomez further concedes, his contentions concerning Almendarez-Torres are also foreclosed. See Grajeda, 581 F.3d at 1197 (holding that Almendarez-Torres is binding unless it is expressly overruled by the Supreme Court).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F. App'x 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-juan-gomez-ca9-2011.