United States v. Juan Delgado

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2026
Docket25-2520
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Juan Delgado (United States v. Juan Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Juan Delgado, (8th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-2520 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Juan Aldo Beltran Delgado

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________

Submitted: June 12, 2026 Filed: June 17, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Juan Delgado appeals the below-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors); see also United States v. McSmith, 968 F.3d 731, 737 (8th Cir. 2020) (disagreement with how district court weighed factors does not demonstrate abuse of discretion).

We have independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Jalen McSmith
968 F.3d 731 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Juan Delgado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-juan-delgado-ca8-2026.