United States v. Juan Castro
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 01 2017 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50074
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-01793-LAB-1 v.
JUAN MANUEL CASTRO, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition, filed on August 22, 2017, is amended as
follows: On page 2, lines 15–16, the phrase “because there was sufficient evidence
of the chain of custody without these documents” is deleted.
With the foregoing amendment, Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing,
filed October 5, 2017, is DENIED. The panel votes to deny the petition for
rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en
banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.
R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc, filed the same date, is DENIED.
No future petitions shall be entertained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Juan Castro (United States v. Juan Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.