United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 F.3d 218
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2016·No. 15-10615·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 15-10615 FILED _____________________ November 4, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff  Appellee

v.

JUAN CASTILLO-RIVERA,

Defendant  Appellant __________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas __________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 2, 2016, 5 Cir., 2016, 836 F.3d 464)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera, (5th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera (United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera
836 F.3d 464 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)