United States v. Juan Ademo-Miranda

644 F. App'x 339
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2016
Docket14-41011
StatusUnpublished

This text of 644 F. App'x 339 (United States v. Juan Ademo-Miranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Juan Ademo-Miranda, 644 F. App'x 339 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

*340 PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Ademo-Miranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir.2011). Ademo-Miranda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. However, the district court committed nonreversible error when it categorized Ademo-Miranda’s Texas offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, which resulted in a sentence of deferred adjudication, as an aggravated felony for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). The judgment of the district court is therefore REFORMED to show that Ademo-Miranda was convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 367-69 (5th Cir.2009). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mondragon-Santiago
564 F.3d 357 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 F. App'x 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-juan-ademo-miranda-ca5-2016.