United States v. Joubert

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Joubert. Read the opinion of the Court — 778 F.3d 247
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 25, 2015·No. 14-1259·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 14-1259

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

ROBERT JOUBERT,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The concurring opinion of this Court issued on February 11, 2015, is amended as follows:

On page 23, lines 12-20: Replace "Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566, 2591 (2012) ("Although the [Commerce] Clause gives Congress authority to legislate . . . , it does not license the exercise of any great substantive and independent power[s] beyond those specifically enumerated. Instead, the Clause is merely a declaration . . . that the means of carrying into execution those [powers] otherwise granted are included in the grant." (second and third alterations in the original) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted))" with "Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566, 2589 (2012) (Roberts, CJ.) (rejecting Congress's ability to enact the Affordable Care Act under the Commerce Clause, and noting that "[w]hile Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause has of course expanded with the growth of the national economy, our cases have 'always recognized that the power to regulate commerce, though broad indeed, has limits'" and that the government's theory would "reach beyond the natural extent of its authority, 'everywhere extending the sphere of its activity and drawing all power into its impetuous vortex'" (quoting Maryland v. Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183, 196 (1968) and The Federalist No. 48, at 309 (James Madison) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961), respectively))."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Joubert, (1st Cir. 2015).

United States v. Joubert (United States v. Joubert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maryland v. Wirtz
392 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1968)
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
132 S. Ct. 2566 (Supreme Court, 2012)