United States v. Joshua M. Tilson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 2005
Docket04-3434
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Joshua M. Tilson (United States v. Joshua M. Tilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joshua M. Tilson, (8th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 04-3434 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Joshua M. Tilson, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: October 21, 2004 Filed: July 15, 2005 ___________

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Joshua M. Tilson entered a guilty plea to unlawful transport of firearms and was sentenced to 180 months in prison. The judgment was entered on July 8, 2004, and his deadline to file a notice of appeal was due July 22, 2004. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); 26(a)(2). Defendant filed his motion to extend time to file notice of appeal on August 13, 2004. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(ii) (allowing the district court1 to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the petitioner shows “excusable neglect or good cause”). The district court denied the motion.

We review a denial of a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal for an abuse of discretion. Gibbons v. United States, 317 F.3d 852, 853-54 (8th Cir. 2003). We find there was no abuse of discretion below because Tilson failed to show excusable neglect or good cause for his filing delay. Further, even if we were to reach the merits of his appeal, Tilson would not be entitled to relief. Tilson seeks to appeal his sentence based on supposed judicial fact-finding in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Tilson’s argument is that the district court should not have considered Tilson’s three prior violent felonies in calculating his sentence. However, Blakely does not apply to the fact of a prior conviction. 124 S. Ct. at 2536. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed. ______________________________

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Court Judge for 1

the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Joshua M. Tilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joshua-m-tilson-ca8-2005.