United States v. Joshua Doty
This text of United States v. Joshua Doty (United States v. Joshua Doty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10194
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00133-LRH-PAL-1 v.
JOSHUA STEPHEN DOTY, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 16, 2018** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, N.R. SMITH, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Defendant-Appellant Joshua Doty appeals from his conviction under 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), arguing that his previous state court conviction for battery
constituting domestic violence under Nevada law does not qualify as a predicate
offense under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Doty’s entire argument on appeal is premised on the proposition that he was
convicted under section 33.018 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, which is in a civil
portion of that code. We disagree. Both Nevada statutes and Nevada case law
make clear that section 200.485 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, which is in a
criminal portion of that code and which is titled “Battery which constitutes
domestic violence,” is the statute under which Doty was previously convicted.
See, e.g., English v. State, 9 P.3d 60, 64 (Nev. 2000) (“The definition and penalties
for battery constituting domestic violence is [sic] codified at [Nevada Revised
Statute §] 200.485 which took effect on January 1, 1998.”).
Doty has waived any argument as to whether section 200.485 is a categorical
match to the federal definition of misdemeanor domestic violence contained in
18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A). See Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency,
261 F.3d 912, 919 (9th Cir. 2001) (“[I]ssues which are not specifically and
distinctly argued and raised in a party’s opening brief are waived.”). We therefore
do not reach that issue.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Joshua Doty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joshua-doty-ca9-2018.