United States v. Joshua Berryhill

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 2019
Docket18-3055
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Joshua Berryhill (United States v. Joshua Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joshua Berryhill, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-3055 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Joshua R. Berryhill,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________

Submitted: June 14, 2019 Filed: August 13, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Berryhill pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). At sentencing, the district court1 determined a base offense level of 20 because Berryhill committed the instant offense after “sustaining one felony conviction of . . . a crime of violence.” USSG § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). The court concluded that either of Berryhill’s two prior Missouri felony convictions—second-degree robbery, in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 569.030, or armed criminal action, in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 571.015—qualified as a “crime of violence.” See USSG § 4B1.2(a). After calculating an advisory guideline range of 51 to 63 months’ imprisonment, the court varied downward from the range and sentenced Berryhill to 48 months’ imprisonment.

Berryhill appeals, arguing that the court committed procedural error by finding that he had sustained a previous conviction for a crime of violence. We have since held, however, that Missouri second-degree robbery is indeed a crime of violence under the sentencing guidelines, United States v. Parker, 929 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2019), so Berryhill’s contention is foreclosed by circuit precedent. The district court did not err in calculating the advisory guideline range.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Tracy Parker
929 F.3d 940 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Joshua Berryhill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joshua-berryhill-ca8-2019.