United States v. Joseph Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2013·No. 13-6766·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6766

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH ALLEN SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00438-LMB-1)

Submitted: September 18, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Allen Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Uzo Asonye, James Patrick McDonald, Eugene Joseph Rossi, Patrick John Shearns, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrew John Ewalt, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Allen Smith appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Smith, No. 1:10-cr-00438-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Joseph Smith, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Joseph Smith (United States v. Joseph Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.