United States v. Joseph Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6766
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH ALLEN SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00438-LMB-1)
Submitted: September 18, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Allen Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Uzo Asonye, James Patrick McDonald, Eugene Joseph Rossi, Patrick John Shearns, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrew John Ewalt, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph Allen Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Smith, No. 1:10-cr-00438-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Joseph Smith (United States v. Joseph Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.