United States v. Joseph Serao, Charles Cafaro, Benjamin Genetempo, Armand Romanelli
This text of 394 F.2d 989 (United States v. Joseph Serao, Charles Cafaro, Benjamin Genetempo, Armand Romanelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
394 F.2d 989
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph SERAO, Charles Cafaro, Benjamin Genetempo, Defendants-Appellants, Armand Romanelli, Defendant.
No. 535.
Docket 30548.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
May 20, 1968.
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After we affirmed the convictions of Serao, Cafaro and Genetempo, 367 F.2d 347 (2 Cir. 1966), the several appellants petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review those affirmances. The writ having been granted, the judgments of conviction in the district court and the judgment of this court affirming the convictions were vacated and the cases were remanded to us, sub nom. Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968) for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).
After taking further consideration we now on the authority of Marchetti remand the cases to the district court and direct that the indictments be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
394 F.2d 989, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-serao-charles-cafaro-benjamin-genetempo-armand-ca2-1968.