United States v. Joseph Saladino

473 F. App'x 617

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: May 21, 2012
• Docket: 10-30236
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Joseph Oquendo Saladino appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 60-month sentence for conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Saladino’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Saladino has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.