United States v. Joseph Robertson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Joseph Robertson. Read the opinion of the Court — 875 F.3d 1281
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2019·No. 16-30178·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-30178

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:15-cr-00007-DWM-1 v.

CARRI ROBERTSON, ORDER*

Defendant-Appellant.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and ROTHSTEIN,** District Judge.

Appellant Carri Robertson’s Motion to Abate Convictions and Restitution

Sentence Ab Initio is GRANTED.

We REMAND to the district court with direction to VACATE the

indictment, the judgment of conviction, the sentence, the special fee assessment,

and the Restitution Order.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Joseph Robertson, (9th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Joseph Robertson (United States v. Joseph Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.