United States v. Joseph R. Gabourel

206 F. App'x 647
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 2006
Docket06-2108
StatusUnpublished

This text of 206 F. App'x 647 (United States v. Joseph R. Gabourel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joseph R. Gabourel, 206 F. App'x 647 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph R. Gabourel entered a conditional plea of guilty to using the Internet to attempt to entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), preserving the right to appeal the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment based on the defense of legal impossibility. The “minor” Gabourel solicited was an undercover police officer posing as a minor. Gabourel contends § 2422(b) requires the victim to be an actual minor.

This same contention has since been squarely addressed and rejected in United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir.2006) (“[W]e hold that an actual minor victim is not required for an attempt conviction under § 2422(b)”); see also United States v. Hicks, 457 F.3d 838, 841 (8th Cir.2006) (following Helder). Following Helder, we affirm the district court.

1

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jan P. Helder, Jr.
452 F.3d 751 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Billy Hicks
457 F.3d 838 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 F. App'x 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-r-gabourel-ca8-2006.