United States v. Joseph R. Gabourel

206 F. App'x 647
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2006·No. 06-2108·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph R. Gabourel entered a conditional plea of guilty to using the Internet to attempt to entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), preserving the right to appeal the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment based on the defense of legal impossibility. The “minor” Gabourel solicited was an undercover police officer posing as a minor. Gabourel contends § 2422(b) requires the victim to be an actual minor.

This same contention has since been squarely addressed and rejected in United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir.2006) (“[W]e hold that an actual minor victim is not required for an attempt conviction under § 2422(b)”); see also United States v. Hicks, 457 F.3d 838, 841 (8th Cir.2006) (following Helder). Following Helder, we affirm the district court.

1

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Joseph R. Gabourel, 206 F. App'x 647 (8th Cir. 2006).

206 F. App'x 647 (United States v. Joseph R. Gabourel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jan P. Helder, Jr.
452 F.3d 751 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Billy Hicks
457 F.3d 838 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)