United States v. Joseph P. Maugere
This text of 293 F.2d 959 (United States v. Joseph P. Maugere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
293 F.2d 959
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Joseph P. MAUGERE, Appellant.
No. 13547.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Sept. 18, 1961.
Decided Sept. 25, 1961.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Richard Hartshorne, Judge.
Joseph P. Maugere pro se.
David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Trenton, N.J., Paul T. Smock, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for appellee.
Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal presents to the Court no substantial question of law or fact.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 F.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-p-maugere-ca3-1961.