United States v. Joseph P. Maugere

293 F.2d 959

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 25, 1961·No. 13547·Published

Opinion

293 F.2d 959

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Joseph P. MAUGERE, Appellant.

No. 13547.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 18, 1961.
Decided Sept. 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Richard Hartshorne, Judge.

Joseph P. Maugere pro se.

David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Trenton, N.J., Paul T. Smock, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents to the Court no substantial question of law or fact.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

293 F.2d 959

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Joseph P. MAUGERE, Appellant.

No. 13547.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 18, 1961.
Decided Sept. 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Richard Hartshorne, Judge.

Joseph P. Maugere pro se.

David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Trenton, N.J., Paul T. Smock, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents to the Court no substantial question of law or fact.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

United States v. Joseph P. Maugere, 293 F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

293 F.2d 959 (United States v. Joseph P. Maugere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.