United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta

811 F.2d 46
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta. Read the opinion of the Court — 688 F.2d 108
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 5, 1982·No. 82-1025·Published

Opinion

Circuit Judges OAKES, MESKILL, NEWMAN, and WINTER dissent from the denial of rehearing in banc, believing that the extension of the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. section 1341 (1976), reflected in the panel decision, warrants in banc consideration of the fundamental and recurring issue whether the statute applies to schemes to defraud members of the public of intangible rights, such as a right to the faithful performance of duty by a public official or a political leader exercising equivalent authority. See Comment, The Intangible-Rights Doctrine and Political Corruption Prosecutions Under the Federal Mail Fraud Statute, 47 U.Chi.L.Rev. 562 (1980).

Circuit Judge PRATT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1982).

811 F.2d 46 (United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.