United States v. Joseph Louis Horvath

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Joseph Louis Horvath

438 F.2d 1235

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1970

Docket20112_1

StatusPublished

This text of 438 F.2d 1235 (United States v. Joseph Louis Horvath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Joseph Louis Horvath, 438 F.2d 1235 (6th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER.

Defendant-appellant appeals from his conviction of aiding and abetting a bank robbery. The only contention presented on appeal is that defendant’s confession should have been excluded from evidence because it was involuntary and resulted from improper inducements of police officials.

The District Court held a hearing outside the presence of the jury and found that the confession was voluntarily made by defendant with a full understanding of his rights. Our review of the record completely supports the conclusion of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM ORDER.

Defendant-appellant appeals from his conviction of aiding and abetting a bank robbery. The only contention presented on appeal is that defendant’s confession should have been excluded from evidence because it was involuntary and resulted from improper inducements of police officials.

The District Court held a hearing outside the presence of the jury and found that the confession was voluntarily made by defendant with a full understanding of his rights. Our review of the record completely supports the conclusion of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 F.2d 1235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-louis-horvath-ca6-1970.