United States v. Joseph L. Burnett

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Joseph L. Burnett

520 F.2d 1373

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 1975

Docket75-1325

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 520 F.2d 1373 (United States v. Joseph L. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Joseph L. Burnett, 520 F.2d 1373 (8th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only issue raised on appeal relates to the proper authorization of special prosecuting attorneys appearing before a grand jury. This issue has recently been decided by this Court wherein we held that the authorization by the Attorney General was proper. See United States v. Agrusa, 520 F.2d 370 (8th Cir. 1975); United States v. DiGirlomo, 520 F.2d 372 (8th Cir. 1975) and United States v. Wrigley, 520 F.2d 362 (8th Cir. 1975).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only issue raised on appeal relates to the proper authorization of special prosecuting attorneys appearing before a grand jury. This issue has recently been decided by this Court wherein we held that the authorization by the Attorney General was proper. See United States v. Agrusa, 520 F.2d 370 (8th Cir. 1975); United States v. DiGirlomo, 520 F.2d 372 (8th Cir. 1975) and United States v. Wrigley, 520 F.2d 362 (8th Cir. 1975).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 F.2d 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-l-burnett-ca8-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack