United States v. Joseph Kolek

728 F.2d 1280, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24247
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 1984
Docket84-5072
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 728 F.2d 1280 (United States v. Joseph Kolek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joseph Kolek, 728 F.2d 1280, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24247 (9th Cir. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER

Despite defendant’s assertion to the contrary, our jurisdiction over prejudgment bail matters is appellate, not original. See 18 U.S.C. § 3147(b); Fed.R.App.P. 9(a). That jurisdiction is invoked by the filing of a notice of appeal filed within 10 days of the date of entry of the district court’s bail order. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(b).

Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over defendant’s request for a reduction of bail pending trial. We therefore remand this appeal to the district court to afford defendant an opportunity to demonstrate excusable neglect for his failure to file a timely notice of appeal. See id.; United States v. Stolarz, 547 F.2d 108, 111 (9th Cir.1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Williams
364 F. App'x 764 (Third Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Giovanni Castiello
878 F.2d 554 (First Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Juan Ruben Estela-Melendez
878 F.2d 24 (First Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 F.2d 1280, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-kolek-ca9-1984.