United States v. Joseph Edward Lee Sullivan

914 F.2d 1493
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 1990
Docket90-6317
StatusUnpublished

This text of 914 F.2d 1493 (United States v. Joseph Edward Lee Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joseph Edward Lee Sullivan, 914 F.2d 1493 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

914 F.2d 1493
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph Edward Lee SULLIVAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6317.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 27, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Oct. 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-76-233-A; CA-90-569)

Joseph Edward Lee Sullivan, appellant pro se.

Constance Harriet Frogale, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Edward Lee Sullivan appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sullivan, CR-76-233-A; CA-90-569 (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

Sullivan's claims that the parole board improperly considered uncounseled convictions to determine his parole eligibility are properly brought under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 in the jurisdiction of confinement

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Seidel (Julian) (2 Cases)
914 F.2d 1493 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 F.2d 1493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-edward-lee-sullivan-ca4-1990.