United States v. Joseph Donato
This text of 379 F.2d 288 (United States v. Joseph Donato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
379 F.2d 288
UNITED STATES of America,
v.
Joseph DONATO, Appellant.
No. 16369.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1967.
Decided May 9, 1967.
Herman Bloom, Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert Fisher, Bloom, Ocks & Fisher, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Robert St. Leger Goggin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Harold S. O'Brian, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, Distrct Judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
On review of this record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court, 269 F.Supp. 921, will be affirmed upon the opinions of Judge Van Dusen therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
379 F.2d 288, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-donato-ca3-1967.