United States v. Joseph Casey
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 2, 2005 No. 05-10241 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-80042-CR-DTKH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH CASEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (November 2, 2005)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Casey appeals his 120-month sentence imposed after he was convicted following his plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The only issue he raises concerns the effect of
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.___, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), on
his sentence. As the government correctly concedes, there was non-constitutional
Booker error in this case, it was preserved, and the government cannot show it was
harmless. Accordingly, Casey is entitled to be resentenced.
The sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions
that Casey is to be resentenced in accord with the Booker decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Joseph Casey (United States v. Joseph Casey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.