United States v. Joseph
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7946
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND JOSEPH, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00360-HEH)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Joseph, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Catherine Wu, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Raymond Joseph, Jr. appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion for Modification of Presentence Report,” made
over one year after he was sentenced for distribution of cocaine.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Joseph, No. 3:04-cr-00360-HEH (E.D. Va.
Nov. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Joseph (United States v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.