United States v. Joseph C. Boone, Jr.

80 F.3d 558, 317 U.S. App. D.C. 82, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41711, 1996 WL 135730
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
Docket94-3128
StatusUnpublished

This text of 80 F.3d 558 (United States v. Joseph C. Boone, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joseph C. Boone, Jr., 80 F.3d 558, 317 U.S. App. D.C. 82, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41711, 1996 WL 135730 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Opinion

80 F.3d 558

317 U.S.App.D.C. 82

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Joseph C. BOONE, Jr., Appellant.

No. 94-3128.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 4, 1996.

Before: WALD, WILLIAMS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the convictions from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed. The district court did not err in refusing to grant appellant's request for a lesser included offense instruction. The evidence presented did not provide a rational basis for the jury to find appellant guilty of the lesser offense of simple possession of a controlled substance. See United States v. Thompson, 994 F.2d 864 (D.C.Cir.1993); United States v. Payne, 805 F.2d 1062 (D.C.Cir.1986); United States v. Thornton, 746 F.2d 39 (1984).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Benjamin T. Thornton
746 F.2d 39 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Frederick v. Payne
805 F.2d 1062 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Patrick Anthony Thompson
994 F.2d 864 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F.3d 558, 317 U.S. App. D.C. 82, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41711, 1996 WL 135730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-c-boone-jr-cadc-1996.