United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr
443 F.2d 381, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9556
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for correction of sentence. Appellant asserts that the oral pronouncement of sentence differed from and should prevail over the written commitment. We have carefully examined the record with regard to the sentencing of appellant and find nothing that supports his assertions.
The order of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr, 443 F.2d 381, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9556 (3d Cir. 1971).
443 F.2d 381 (United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Thomas Chasmer
952 F.2d 50 (Third Circuit, 1991)