United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr

Third Circuit

United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr

443 F.2d 381, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9556

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1971

Docket19042

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 443 F.2d 381 (United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Joseph Arthur Keenan Appeal of Michael Joseph O'COnnOr, 443 F.2d 381, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9556 (3d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for correction of sentence. Appellant asserts that the oral pronouncement of sentence differed from and should prevail over the written commitment. We have carefully examined the record with regard to the sentencing of appellant and find nothing that supports his assertions.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for correction of sentence. Appellant asserts that the oral pronouncement of sentence differed from and should prevail over the written commitment. We have carefully examined the record with regard to the sentencing of appellant and find nothing that supports his assertions.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F.2d 381, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joseph-arthur-keenan-appeal-of-michael-joseph-oconnor-ca3-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack