United States v. Jose Villarreal-Cardenas
This text of United States v. Jose Villarreal-Cardenas (United States v. Jose Villarreal-Cardenas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 18-40737 Document: 00514780376 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/03/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 18-40737 January 3, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE GUADALUPE VILLARREAL-CARDENAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-144-1
Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Guadalupe Villarreal-Cardenas appeals his guilty-plea conviction for importation of 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. He argues that the factual basis for his guilty plea was insufficient because the Government did not prove that he knew the type and quantity of the controlled substance involved in his offense.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-40737 Document: 00514780376 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/03/2019
No. 18-40737
As Villarreal-Cardenas concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), did not overturn United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003), and that the Government is not required to prove knowledge of the drug type and quantity as an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 drug trafficking offense. Likewise, knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element that must be proven for an offense under the related drug importation statutes of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a). United States v. Restrepo-Granda, 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344, 345-46 (5th Cir. 1999). Thus, the Government was not required to prove that Villarreal- Cardenas knew the type and quantity of the controlled substance involved in his drug importation offense. Accordingly, Villarreal-Cardenas’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jose Villarreal-Cardenas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-villarreal-cardenas-ca5-2019.