United States v. Jose Victor

711 F. App'x 362
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 12, 2018
Docket17-2322
StatusUnpublished

This text of 711 F. App'x 362 (United States v. Jose Victor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Victor, 711 F. App'x 362 (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jose Eduardo Victor appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release, and sentenced him to 18 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. His counsel has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the revocation sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889, 890 (8th Cir. 2008) (abuse-of-discretion review); see also United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (district court acted well within its broad discretion in imposing above-Guidelines revocation sentence where it considered appropriate 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, sufficiently explained reasoning for. variance, and .imposed sentence within statutory limits).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Growden
663 F.3d 982 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Merrival
521 F.3d 889 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 F. App'x 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-victor-ca8-2018.