United States v. Jose Trejo

589 F. App'x 253
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 31, 2014
Docket14-40278
StatusUnpublished

This text of 589 F. App'x 253 (United States v. Jose Trejo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Trejo, 589 F. App'x 253 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Bacilio Trejo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for transporting an undocumented alien within the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a) (1) (A) (ii), (a)(l)(A)(v)(II), and (a)(l)(B)(i). He contends that the district court clearly erred when it denied him a minor role reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.2(b).

Whether Trejo was a minor participant is a factual determination that is reviewed for clear error. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 (5th Cir. 2005). There is no clear error if the district court’s factual finding is “plausible in light of the record read as a whole.” Id.

Section 3B 1.2(b) provides for a two-level reduction in a defendant’s offense level if he was a “minor” participant. The minor-role adjustment applies to defendants who are only peripherally involved in the crime. Villanueva, 408 F.3d at 204. The applicability of § 3B1.2 rests on whether the defendant’s role was minor in relation to the conduct for which he was held accountable, not in relation to the criminal enterprise as a whole. United States v. Garcia, 242 F.3d 593, 598 (5th Cir.2001).

The record evidence reflects that Trejo illegally transported seven undocumented aliens, including an unaccompanied minor, from Mission, Texas, to a motel in Pharr, Texas. Trejo’s role of driving the illegal aliens to the motel was not peripheral to the advancement of the criminal activity to which Trejo pleaded guilty — transporting an undocumented alien within the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain. See Villanueva, 408 F.3d at 203-04. As the driver, Trejo’s role was central to the operation of transporting aliens and clearly “coextensive with the conduct for which he was held accountable.” Garcia, 242 F.3d at 598-99. In addition, the record evidence indicated that Trejo had been given other responsibility that contributed to the success of the offense; he was found in possession of money as well as a key to the motel room where he left the aliens, and *254 he was told to buy food. The district court’s factual finding is “plausible in light of the record read as a whole.” Villanueva, 408 F.3d at 203. Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in rejecting Trejo’s request for a minor role adjustment under § 3B 1.2(b). Id. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Garcia
242 F.3d 593 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Villanueva
408 F.3d 193 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-trejo-ca5-2014.