United States v. Jose Torres-Martinez

617 F. App'x 359
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 15-40059·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Luis Torres-Martinez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, this court rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” Accordingly, Torres-Martinez’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Torres-Martinez, 617 F. App'x 359 (5th Cir. 2015).

617 F. App'x 359 (United States v. Jose Torres-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Francisco Morales-Mota
704 F.3d 410 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)