United States v. Jose Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2015·No. 13-51197·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 13-51197 Document: 00512966885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51197 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED March 12, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-164-2

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-51197 Document: 00512966885 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2015

No. 13-51197

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 2015).

United States v. Jose Rodriguez (United States v. Jose Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)