United States v. Jose Ramirez
This text of 361 F. App'x 807 (United States v. Jose Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jose Ramirez appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ramirez contends that the district court erred when it determined that Ramirez was not eligible for the “safety valve” relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)- The district court did not clearly err when it determined that Ramirez failed to truthfully provide to the government all relevant information concerning the conduct for which he was convicted and sentenced. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); see also United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F. App'x 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-ramirez-ca9-2010.